Sumerians And Egyptians Essay, Research Paper There are many ways that Ancient Egypt society and Mesopotamia society are similar and at the same time they are very different. The most important ways that their society’s differ and are alike are in their government, religion, social structure, scientific accomplishments, and their outlook on life. The ways that the Egypt government and the Mesopotamia government differ are how they are ruled. Egypt was one kingdom and it was divided in to provinces or names, the kingdom was ruled by one person known as the Pharaoh. The provinces were ruled by nemarchs. Mesopotamia had many independent city-states with its own government and ruler. In Egypt there was political unification achieved and in Mesopotamia political unification was rarely achieved. The Egyptian government was more of a stronger centralized government and the Sumerian government was not as strong and more independent. Egyptian and Sumerian religions have a lot of similarities. For one thing they were both polytheistic. In Egypt people in each village worshipped a village god in addition to other gods. Sumerians worshipped others gods in addition to the god of their city-state. In Egypt the ruler or the Pharaoh was a god, and in Mesopotamia the rulers weren’t known as gods they were knows as representatives of gods. Both Egyptians and Sumerians both believed that different gods controlled the forces of nature. The Egyptians had a positive view on the afterlife, but the Sumerians had a dark gloomy view of the afterlife because they thought the gods were always punishing them. Both Egyptians and Sumerians had their own systems of writing, even though they were different they had their similarities. Egyptian writing was known as hieroglyphics, which were basically pictures of objects. They mainly used hieroglyphics for records of religious rituals. At first Egyptians carved hieroglyphics on to stone or wood, later they used flattened papyrus reeds and wrote with ink and brushes. Sumerian writing was known as cuneiform. Cuneiform was simply symbols representing sounds and syllables. Sumerians used a stylus, or a sharpened reed instrument, to make write on wet tablets of clay. They baked the tablets so they would harden up and be saved for records. The people that did most of their writing were known as scribes. Priest set up schools for the scribes in temples. Egyptians and Sumerians both had scientific accomplishments that they were known for. Sumerians were the first people known to use the wheel. The wheel helped the Sumerians for a lot of things. The Sumerians made many improvements on farming. They built complex irrigation systems to channel water though out the farmland. Both Egyptians and Sumerians used arithmetic and geometry to survey land and reestablish property likes after floods swept away boundary markers. The Sumerian system was based on the number 60. Sumerians were the first to use arches, columns, ramps, and inclined walks. Egyptians produced a calendar with a 365-day year. They divided the year into 12 months. They also made medical discoveries, they learned how to perform surgery, how to set fractured bones and to treat spinal injuries. They were known for their impressive stone monuments. They learned how to cut tall obelisks from a single rock, using hot fires and cold water to make the surrounding rocks crack. The Egyptian outlook on life and the Sumerian outlook on life are totally different. The Egyptians had a positive outlook on like but on the other hand the Sumerians had a dark gloomy one. The reasons for this are simple. The Egyptians were looking forward to their afterlife, their afterlife, they believed, consisted them being happy, well fed, and busy with the same activities they had enjoyed during their life. Because of that the Egyptians had something to look forward to after they died. Also in Egypt, the favorable climate of the Nile Valley allowed the people to enjoy life and see their gods as kindly forces. By, contrast, the Sumerians feared of natural disasters and invasions, which probably contributed to the gloomy outlook on life. They believed that the gods punished them with floods and or famine. Their gloomy outlook on life made them have a bad aspect on their afterlife. They believed that at death that they were going to descend forever into a dark underworld, a huge cave filled with nothing but dust and silence. Because of this they had nothing to look forward to after death so this made their like miserable. This is how the Egyptian society and the Mesopotamia society are alike and different. They have many alike things and also many differences. They both have their ups and their downs.
Похожие работы
Theodore Dreiser’s novel “An American tragedy”
MINISTRY OFHIGHER AND SECONDARY SPECIAL EDUCATION OF THEREPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN GULISTAN STATEUNIVERSITY «TheodoreDreiser’s novel «An American tragedy», its translation into Uzbek andRussian» Gulistan‑2006 1.Theodore Dreiser…
Обучение детей письму \укр\
Обучение детей письму ПЛАНВступ… Частина1. Загальне визначення письма, яквид мовленнєвої діяльності………………………………………… 1.1 Загальне визначенняписьма……………………………………………. 1.2 Лінгвопсихологічніособливості письма…………………………… 1.3 Цілі та принципи навчанняписьма…………………………………. Частина 2. Методи…
Ben Jonson and his Comedies
MINISTRYOF HIGHER AND SECONDARY SPECIAL EDUCATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN GULISTANSTATE UNIVERSITY TheEnglish and Literature Department Qualificationwork on speciality English philology onthe theme: “BenJonson…
Концепт "влада" в українські мовній картині світу
Магістерська робота КОНЦЕПТ «ВЛАДА» ВУКРАЇНСЬКІЙ МОВНІЙ КАРТИНІ СВІТУ Київ – 2007р. ВСТУП Серед актуальних напрямів сучасного мовознавства усе більшеутверджується когнітологічний напрям, який найтісніше пов’язаний з…
Національно-культурний компонент семантики порівнянь на прикладі ЛСП "Зовнішність людини" в німецькій і українській мовах
Тернопільськийнаціональний педагогічний університет ім.В. Гнатюка Кафедранімецької мови Дипломнаробота натему: «Національно-культурнийкомпонент семантики порівнянь на прикладі ЛСП «Зовнішність людини» в німецькійі…